Job Application Truth or Consequences: Be True, Complete and Accurate

Share it
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

truth_or_consequences With social transparency and increased access to public records and information, it is critical that job application truth or consequences makes it a legal document. The inevitable choice you make is between Truth or Consequences.

Whether on paper, or online, you are sharing information that by your signature, are stating is true, complete and accurate.  You are sharing information that will ultimately be used by an employer to determine your eligibility to work for them. Be complete and accurate.

30 years ago, it may have been possible to hide that one time that an error in judgment got you in trouble with the law. It was possible because newspapers were the primary method of communicating what happened the night before on the police beat. As newspapers were discarded, the memory faded.

Today, however, information is persistent. News is published on the web, and historical records are persistent. Google has helped make information accessible and the internet has allowed it to be stored forever.

Truth or Consequences

Except for a few jobs (like working with children, handling financial instruments, etc.), laws protect you from discrimination solely based on your mistakes of the past. So be truthful about your past.

However, lying on a job application is an invitation for an employer to eliminate you on the basis of being dishonest. There are consequences for being less than honest. And today’s persistent and searchable information stream makes discovery inevitable.

Today, you stand a much better chance of an employer wanting to give you a chance if you disclose anything you may be hesitating to share about your past. If you are applying for a role, or with an employer, that requires a background check, Be complete and accurate.

What you think they might not find out about your past has a significantly better chance of being discovered today with big data, the internet and Google.  In addition to reference checking, there’s a better than 80% chance that an employer will Google you to validate what is on your application.

The conclusion your potential employer will draw is that you are dishonest – and that is a reason to rank you lower than a candidate that has been truthful and fully disclosed their history.

Barton Staffing Solutions gives applicants guidance in this area. We regularly work with clients and employees to ensure the smoothes hiring process, even when there are special circumstances. But incomplete, inaccurate, or false information on your application is not an obstacle anyone can overcome.  Always be complete and accurate.

Share it
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Related Posts

Lock in Consistent Hours for Your Business: Practical Staffing Insights for Manufacturing, Warehouse, and Light Industrial Operations

A practical guide for production and warehouse workers juggling childcare costs and school schedules. Covers how to negotiate shift patterns that align with school calendars, what questions to ask recruiters about schedule stability, and why early placement (before August rush) means better commute options and shift choices. Positions Barton’s local-first approach as the solution to the typical agency runaround.

Read More

Commute Math: Why Your 45-Minute Drive Is Costing You More Than You Think

Tackles one of Barton’s core differentiators: realistic commute expectations. Breaks down hidden costs of long commutes (fuel, vehicle wear, lost time, stress), shows how local placement directly impacts take-home pay, and explains why proximity matters for shift flexibility. Real numbers for Western Chicago suburbs. Addresses the ‘agency ghost’ and ‘wrong location’ frustrations in the core message.

Read More